<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe a Panel Peak, but no peak yet for survey takers</title>
	<link>http://insights20.com/2007/10/06/maybe-a-panel-peak-but-no-peak-yet-for-survey-takers/</link>
	<description>consumer insights reloaded</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jak traktowa? uczestnika panelu badawczego? &#124; OnlineResearch.pl</title>
		<link>http://insights20.com/2007/10/06/maybe-a-panel-peak-but-no-peak-yet-for-survey-takers/#comment-82091</link>
		<author>Jak traktowa? uczestnika panelu badawczego? &#124; OnlineResearch.pl</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insights20.com/2007/10/06/maybe-a-panel-peak-but-no-peak-yet-for-survey-takers/#comment-82091</guid>
		<description>[...] fragment tekstu znalaz?em kilka dni temu na blogu Insights20.com Oliviera de Gaudemar: Joining an online is agreeing not to take one survey, but to take many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] fragment tekstu znalaz?em kilka dni temu na blogu Insights20.com Oliviera de Gaudemar: Joining an online is agreeing not to take one survey, but to take many [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jak traktowa? uczestnika panelu badawczego? &#124; OnlineResearch.pl</title>
		<link>http://insights20.com/2007/10/06/maybe-a-panel-peak-but-no-peak-yet-for-survey-takers/#comment-77790</link>
		<author>Jak traktowa? uczestnika panelu badawczego? &#124; OnlineResearch.pl</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insights20.com/2007/10/06/maybe-a-panel-peak-but-no-peak-yet-for-survey-takers/#comment-77790</guid>
		<description>[...] fragment tekstu znalaz?em kilka dni temu na blogu Insights20.com Oliviera de Gaudemar: Joining an online is agreeing not to take one survey, but to take many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] fragment tekstu znalaz?em kilka dni temu na blogu Insights20.com Oliviera de Gaudemar: Joining an online is agreeing not to take one survey, but to take many [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon briggs</title>
		<link>http://insights20.com/2007/10/06/maybe-a-panel-peak-but-no-peak-yet-for-survey-takers/#comment-77249</link>
		<author>jon briggs</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insights20.com/2007/10/06/maybe-a-panel-peak-but-no-peak-yet-for-survey-takers/#comment-77249</guid>
		<description>Olivier,

I like Pete's ideas too and I also heard this presentation in Orlando. I found the Oil analogy quite interesting but actually I would make a different twist on that line of discourse.

We have been threatened with oil shortage for 40 years. In reality there is none. There never will be. For our social, cultural, economic and technical appraisals change over time - whether that be by war, by discovery, by new technology or even legislation.

Those who push the oil arguments on scarcity do so out of self interest.

Panels are the same. Those who push communities and such impending doom on panels do so for the same reason as oil. Don't get me wrong I am not saying that communities (or oil alternatives) are not invaluable and great things, but what I am saying is that they come from a certain direction and are hyped by some more than others according to their background. (For the record, I am selling 'communities' as well, so certainly not biased!)

That is why I found his argument interesting in the main because it was a direct analogy. And both are packaged nicely.

Same for 'overpopulation'.

See you soon I hope....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Olivier,</p>
<p>I like Pete&#8217;s ideas too and I also heard this presentation in Orlando. I found the Oil analogy quite interesting but actually I would make a different twist on that line of discourse.</p>
<p>We have been threatened with oil shortage for 40 years. In reality there is none. There never will be. For our social, cultural, economic and technical appraisals change over time - whether that be by war, by discovery, by new technology or even legislation.</p>
<p>Those who push the oil arguments on scarcity do so out of self interest.</p>
<p>Panels are the same. Those who push communities and such impending doom on panels do so for the same reason as oil. Don&#8217;t get me wrong I am not saying that communities (or oil alternatives) are not invaluable and great things, but what I am saying is that they come from a certain direction and are hyped by some more than others according to their background. (For the record, I am selling &#8216;communities&#8217; as well, so certainly not biased!)</p>
<p>That is why I found his argument interesting in the main because it was a direct analogy. And both are packaged nicely.</p>
<p>Same for &#8216;overpopulation&#8217;.</p>
<p>See you soon I hope&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
