<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About the power and speed of word-of-mouth: will Pirates 2 beat Aquaman?</title>
	<link>http://insights20.com/2006/07/07/about-the-power-and-speed-of-word-of-mouth-will-pirates2-beat-aquaman/</link>
	<description>consumer insights reloaded</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Splogs give smarter comments at insights 2.0</title>
		<link>http://insights20.com/2006/07/07/about-the-power-and-speed-of-word-of-mouth-will-pirates2-beat-aquaman/#comment-258</link>
		<author>Splogs give smarter comments at insights 2.0</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://insights20.com/2006/07/07/about-the-power-and-speed-of-word-of-mouth-will-pirates2-beat-aquaman/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] On my post &#8220;About the power and speed of word-of-mouth: will Pirates 2 beat Aquaman?&#8220;, I received the comment:  &#8220;Pirates 2 pretty much sucked compared to the first one. It had a few good parts, but I think it was just a prelude to the 3rd one. I hope number 3 is better! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] On my post &#8220;About the power and speed of word-of-mouth: will Pirates 2 beat Aquaman?&#8220;, I received the comment:  &#8220;Pirates 2 pretty much sucked compared to the first one. It had a few good parts, but I think it was just a prelude to the 3rd one. I hope number 3 is better! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

